![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
... your best bet is to provide a company web site that gives me the information I need, lets me bookmark it, gives me a form I can fill out to perform my transaction, and lets me bookmark that so I can come back to it if I get called away from my desk.
If you make me look for your phone number and call you, I'm going to start out irritated. If I get an answering machine, I'm not going to hang up, compose a coherent message, call back, and leave it. I'm going to get even more irritated, and call the next person up the food chain.
If that person calls me back (after a four day weekend that the company I work for does not celebrate) while I'm in a meeting asking if I really meant to do what I'd left clear instructions about doing, it would help if they call from a phone I can simply call back instead of having to parse their private number out of a message that gets delayed somewhere on my provider's voice mail system. And if I get another answering machine when I call them back...
I'm just saying.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 03:58 am (UTC)On top of the fact that insurance companies have fiduciary duties, and agents have fiduciary duties to both companies and policyholders.
Even more than banking, insurance would benefit from cryptographic authentication. It would make things a LOT easier for the clients, since the agents wouldn't have to worry about authenticating the messages.
I agree, they could handle it a lot better, though.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-26 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-25 11:16 pm (UTC)